VN:R_U [1.9.3_1094]
Print This Article Print This Article Email This Article Email This Article

Categorized | Economy

Hidden icebergs targets U.S. economy

Posted on 23 July 2009

By Patrick Wood, Editor

Econ­o­mists (and gov­ern­ment leaders) are missing some key ele­ments of eco­nomic reality that will deter­mine our course of suc­cess or failure over the next three to five years.

First, there is the dearth of tax rev­enue at all levels of gov­ern­ment. Cal­i­fornia recently demon­strated that a state cannot buck the market of reality for­ever, and is now being forced to dis­mantle much of which it bragged about over the years of eco­nomic prosperity.

While Cal­i­fornia, as usual, gets exces­sive press cov­erage, there are at least 32 other states in sim­ilar or worse condition.

Even­tu­ally, this will catch up with the Fed­eral gov­ern­ment and it won’t be pretty when it does.

Sec­ondly, banks have reverted to hiding toxic assets again. This time, it’s loans and invest­ments in com­mer­cial real estate. The value of many shop­ping malls and office build­ings have fared much worse than res­i­den­tial real estate values. But, it’s rel­a­tively easy to refi­nance a home com­pared to a $5 mil­lion office building that is 30 per­cent vacant.

Sooner or later, the banks are going to have to play “mark to market” with these dete­ri­o­rating assets.

Thirdly, the expanding bubble of gov­ern­ment debt will soon burst. Even the nation’s auditor, the Gen­eral Accounting Office, has stated that spending and debt levels are unsus­tain­able. The unfunded lia­bil­i­ties of the U.S. is now in excess of $65 tril­lion, and will reach $80 tril­lion by 2012 if cur­rent levels of encum­brance con­tinue. This vir­tu­ally guar­an­tees that the U.S. will be forced to declare bank­ruptcy if it doesn’t change its ways, and soon.

Fourthly, demo­graphic forces are pitted against eco­nomic recovery. As the aging pop­u­la­tion leaves the work­force, there are not enough young, skilled workers to replace lost earn­ings. The number of chil­dren in our society con­tinues to decline, meaning that fewer workers must sus­tain a larger older generation.

Pop­u­la­tion decline is the result of a con­certed effort to sup­press growth. It started in earnest during the late 60’s and early 70’s. The bible for over­pop­u­la­tion issues was Paul Ehrlich’s book, The Pop­u­la­tion Bomb, written in 1968.

The legal­iza­tion of abor­tion in 1973 (Roe v. Wade) has reduced our poten­tial pool of youth by at least 40 mil­lion. Gov­ern­ment pro­grams have been aimed at pro­ducing smaller fam­i­lies. The gay lifestyle has not pro­moted family or reproduction.

The result of these demo­graph­i­cally neg­a­tive forces has been to drop our repro­duc­tive ratio to well under 2.1 chil­dren per family, which is below the level required to sus­tain a pop­u­la­tion… and hence, our economy activity.

Econ­o­mists can rattle off sta­tis­tics and make almost any­thing look rosy but the Amer­ican people know better. These are the ones who are living real lives in real com­mu­ni­ties and working (or not) in real jobs. These are the ones who once com­prised the opti­mistic middle class that is now in real danger of becoming the des­ti­tute class.

In short, the economy is not poised for a return to glory. In reality, it is appointed for fur­ther dete­ri­o­ra­tion and even­tu­ally, dis­in­te­gra­tion. Even if there were things that the gov­ern­ment or the Fed­eral Reserve could do to mit­i­gate these issues, they are clearly going in the oppo­site direction.

For instance, Vice Pres­i­dent Joe Biden recently told a group of AARP mem­bers: “Now, people when I say that look at me and say, ‘What are you talking about, Joe? You’re telling me we have to go spend money to keep from going bank­rupt?’ The answer is ‘yes’, that’s what I’m telling you.” (Listen to Audio).

With leaders like this, who needs enemies?

Hidden ice­bergs tar­gets U.S. economy , 5.0 out of 5 based on 2 ratings
  • Share/Bookmark

4 Responses to “Hidden icebergs targets U.S. economy”

  1. Diana Gwinn says:

    There’s a piece missing from this sce­nario and that is the sur­plus labor force, excluding for­eign or illegal workers. There is a dearth of live­able wage employ­ment in this country and future job fore­casts are dire. We no longer have a viable man­u­fac­turing base and that’s not likely to change in the near future. If we had more youth, what would we do with them? We could do just what we’re doing now, put them in prison or send them off to kill or be killed in wars of aggres­sion against civilian pop­u­la­tions in for­eign coun­tries. This is a failed system… period. Family planning/legal abor­tion, gay lifestyle and smaller fam­i­lies are not the problem.

    VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
    • David Joly says:

      @ Diana Gwinn

      I agree that the cur­rent system is a failed system. How­ever, the coming demo­graphic winter is the looming storm on the horizon our self-glorified leaders don’t want to talk about. We may limp along for a little while yet, tem­porarily sup­ported by deficit spending. The reduced pop­u­la­tion of young people, though, has cre­ated a vacuum in the economy. There have been some 50 mil­lion abor­tions in the last 36 years or so? At 2 chil­dren per family, that has likely resulted in the loss of 20 mil­lion fam­i­lies. That rep­re­sents busi­ness owners, home owners, workers, and overall wealth creation.

      Our eco­nomic system would be in trouble even if it weren’t failing at the moment. The burden of the aging pop­u­la­tion is just too much. With the cur­rent system failing the burden on the younger gen­er­a­tion can only be com­pounded (with the loss of retire­ment sav­ings and family trusts). The forces of pop­u­la­tion con­trol and bad eco­nomics will work syn­er­gis­ti­cally to do us in.

      VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
      VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  2. Patrick Wood says:

    Yes, but is the system tem­porarily or per­ma­nently failed? I don’t think that free enter­prise has been inval­i­dated. It’s the mantra of free trade that has ruined us. Free enter­prise doesn’t account for ruth­less and amoral manip­u­la­tors who refuse to play by any rules except what is con­ve­nient for themselves.

    VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  3. larry751 says:

    Any Building is Sup­ported by I-Beams. If you take out enough I-Beams the Building is Coming DOWN.

    The USA is like a Building. IF you take out enough Man­u­fac­turing Jobs .… then the USA is coming DOWN.

    Between Job Expor­ta­tion and Illegal Immi­gra­tion Our Blessed USA is being Double Whamyed. And the Only Win­ners are the Globalist’s on Wall Street who buy of our Politi­cians in DC to keep this Process of Destruc­tion going.

    Sooner or later It is going Down and it will take Gen­er­a­tions to bounce back up agian.

    VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Member Login...

You are not currently logged in.






» Register
» Lost your Password?

Site Sponsors

ppl-anim

Hyper-Inflation?

Brainstorm

Daily Updates

Loading...Loading...


Site Sponsors

Affordable Web Site Development

Ergodynamic-125x125

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes