Trilateral Commission influence in the Eurozone

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInShare on TumblrDigg thisBuffer this pagePin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

by Patrick Wood

Speaking of his Tri­lat­eral Commission’s influ­ence in the orig­inal cre­ation of the Euro­pean Union, David Rock­e­feller wrote in 1998,

“Back in the early Sev­en­ties, the hope for a more united EUROPE was already full-blown — thanks in many ways to the indi­vidual ener­gies pre­vi­ously spent by so many of the Tri­lat­eral Commission’s ear­liest mem­bers.” [Cap­i­tals in orig­inal] (Rock­e­feller, David; In the Begin­ning; The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion at 25, 1998, p.11)

Some argued that “that was then and this is now,” and that the Commission’s influ­ence had waned with the passing of the older generation.

Non­sense. It was Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sioner Vallery d’Estaing who authored the EU’s Con­sti­tu­tion in 2002 – 2003 when he was Pres­i­dent of the Con­ven­tion on the Future of Europe.

On November 10, 2011, Robert Wenzel, Editor & Pub­lisher of the Eco­nomic Policy Journal, wrote the fol­lowing short report:

And the Big Time Banksters Come Marching In

“Here’s what you need to know about the cur­rent crisis in the Euro­zone. The big time banksters are get­ting direct hands on control:

“Mario Drgahi has become pres­i­dent of the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank as of November 1. He was vice chairman and man­aging director of Goldman Sachs Inter­na­tional and a member of the firm-wide man­age­ment com­mittee. He was the Italian Exec­u­tive Director at the World Bank. He has been a Fellow of the Insti­tute of Pol­i­tics at the John F. Kennedy School of Gov­ern­ment, Har­vard University.

“Lucas Papademos takes over today as Prime Min­ister of Greece. He was an econ­o­mist at the Fed­eral Reserve Bank of Boston. He was a vis­iting pro­fessor of public policy at the Kennedy School of Gov­ern­ment at Har­vard Uni­ver­sity. And, he was pre­vi­ously a vice pres­i­dent of the Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank. He has been a member of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion since 1998.

“Indi­ca­tions are that Mario Monti will suc­ceed Silvio Berlus­coni as prime min­ister of Italy, within in days. Monti com­pleted grad­uate studies at Yale Uni­ver­sity, where he studied under James Tobin (see the Tobin Tax). He is a member of the Euro­pean Com­mis­sion. He is Euro­pean Chairman of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion and and member of the Bilder­berg Group.

“If you get the sense that the elitist banksters are going to take this finan­cial crisis and push it in what­ever direc­tion they want, you are prob­ably very right.”

As you can see, little has changed since 1973, and the same Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion mem­ber­ship keeps pop­ping up in the most hal­lowed posi­tions of power and influ­ence. The Commission’s defense is that it was simply coin­ci­dental for their mem­bers to be picked for var­ious high-level posi­tions because of their supe­rior tal­ents and abil­i­ties. This is not hearsay: I have had this spoken directly to me by mem­bers of the Commission.

Con­sid­ering that the mem­ber­ship hovers around 300 – 350 at any given time,  it is sta­tis­ti­cally impos­sible that they could have been ran­domly picked at such a high fre­quency over such a long period of time. In the U.S. alone since 1973, Com­mis­sion mem­bers held

  • 8 out of 10 U.S. Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive appointments
  • 6 our of 8 World Bank presidencies
  • 6 out of 7 President/Vice Pres­i­dent elections

Could any sane person think that they Tri­lat­erals just stum­bled into all of these posi­tions?  Of course not.

The his­tor­ical evi­dence declares that the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion hijacked the global polit­ical system for the exact pur­poses it stated in 1973. That is, to “foster a New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order.”

Just who rules the world economy?

When Antony Sutton and myself studied the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion in 1978, one ana­lyt­ical tech­nique we used was a deriv­a­tive of soci­ology called “net­work topology.” We assem­bled names of direc­tors, exec­u­tives and major share­holders of com­pa­nies asso­ci­ated with the Tri­lat­erals and then dia­grammed them to show over­laps and other non-obvious asso­ci­a­tions. Our results were stun­ning. We found a tight inter­locking net­work that was far stronger than a bunch of inde­pen­dent com­pa­nies. In graph­ical form, the net­work was clearly vis­ible. (See Tri­lat­erals Over Wash­ington, Volume I)

Recently, three researchers in Switzer­land (S. Vitali, J.B. Glat­tfelder, and S. Bat­tiston) have released a sim­ilar and modern study called “The net­work of global cor­po­rate con­trol.” In the abstract they state,

“We find that transna­tional cor­po­ra­tions form a giant bow-tie struc­ture and that a large por­tion of con­trol flows to a small tightly-knit core of finan­cial insti­tu­tions. This core can be seen as an eco­nomic “super-entity” that raises new impor­tant issues both for researchers and policy makers.”

This is an under­state­ment. In Table S1 buried in the appendix, they list the “top 50 control-holders,” where share­holders are ranked according to their level of net­work con­trol. These are the com­pa­nies who com­prise the inner-core of global control.

Of the 50 com­pa­nies, 45 are banks, insur­ance or other finan­cial insti­tu­tions. From the U.S. we see the usual: State Street, JP Morgan Chase, B of A, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and others.

In short, this core of banks/financials are the real rulers of the world economy. There is no spec­u­la­tion here: This is hard and com­pelling evidence.

This is also the exact same con­clu­sion that Sutton and I reached in 1978 with more rudi­men­tary, non-computerized analysis.

The report concludes,

“This is the first time a ranking of eco­nomic actors by global con­trol is pre­sented. Notice that many actors belong to the finan­cial sector (NACE codes starting with 65,66,67) and many of the names are well-known global players. The interest of this ranking is not that it exposes unsus­pected pow­erful players. Instead, it shows that many of the top actors belong to the core. This means that they do not carry out their busi­ness in iso­la­tion but, on the con­trary, they are tied together in an extremely entan­gled web of con­trol. This finding is extremely impor­tant since there was no prior eco­nomic theory or empir­ical evi­dence regarding whether and how top players are con­nected. Finally, it should be noted that gov­ern­ments and nat­ural per­sons are only fea­tured fur­ther down in the list.” [emphasis added]

Zbig­niew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion with David Rock­e­feller in 1973, summed up the “net­work” in his 1970 Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Tech­netronic Era:

“The nation-­state as a fun­da­mental unit of man’s orga­nized life has ceased to be the prin­cipal cre­ative force: Inter­na­tional banks and multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions are acting and plan­ning in terms that are far in advance of the polit­ical con­cepts of the nation-state.” [emphasis added]

Unfor­tu­nately, this is the reality of the matter. With inter­na­tional banks at the center and var­ious multi­na­tional com­pa­nies in the periphery, the net­work con­tinues to dom­i­nate and con­trol the course of world events. The cit­i­zens of the respec­tive coun­tries are little more than objects to be taxed and manipulated.

In Europe, the finan­cial demise of Italy and Greece threatens to melt down the Euro­pean region, if not the entire global economy. That Tri­lat­eral bankers Papademos and Monti, respec­tively, would take the helm as Prime Min­ister of their own nation-state should be likened to be a receiver­ship move designed to pro­tect the assets of the banks (the “Net­work”) they rep­re­sent. If nothing else, it cer­tainly shows that the Tri­lat­eral hege­mony over Europe is alive and well.

Until this hege­mony is somehow dis­solved, the game of national polit­ical elec­tions (In the U.S. or Europe) is largely an exer­cise in futility. Elec­tors are simply deceived when they fail to rec­og­nize and address the real power behind the political/economic system.

, , , ,

44 Responses to Trilateral Commission influence in the Eurozone

  1. Derek November 11, 2011 at 1:42 pm #

    great post!!

  2. Craig Stelck November 11, 2011 at 2:16 pm #

    I have a folder with August Review arti­cles from over the rears. I have read a few books on this sub­ject as well. What is really scary is the fact that comatose cit­i­zens of this country have had their hard drives pro­grammed with every­thing but the truth of how this country is owned and run by ruling blood­line banking fam­i­lies. My God, if having a fake pres­i­dent who never made change from a kool-aid stand isn’t proof that the pres­i­dent doesn’t con­trol any­thing then there is no hope for the fake news watching dopes in this country.

  3. Stan November 11, 2011 at 5:10 pm #

    Absolutely spot on Craig. Because the Global threat is com­plex in length, breadth and depth,I would sug­gest the fol­lowing sim­pli­fied format to enable the ‘como­tose’ cit­i­zens to get a clearer “pic­ture” of the his­tor­ical facts and truth behind their respec­tive gov­ern­ments, and learn who actu­ally con­trols them.
    This may appear over­sim­pli­fied & silly, but it is effec­tive for those who cannot think out­side the box.
    Pic­ture our global dilema as a (very) large jigsaw puzzle. A pyramid shaped jigsaw puzzle if you will,with the global elite at the top of the pyramid and the worker(s) ants at the bottom with the middle class in between.
    First (research) locate and iden­tify the key pieces.
    Here are some of the key pieces to (google) look for;
    Roth­schild Dynasty. Morgan/Warburg,Rockefeller Banking.Federal Reserve ori­gins. CFR/Trilateral Com­mis­sion. Bilder­berg Group-remember to search the mem­ber­ship ros­ters of these orga­ni­za­tions for familiar names. The UN.IMF.NWO.Agenda 21. Socialist indoc­tri­na­tion in US schools & Colleges.Read mate­rial written by any of the fol­lowing; Dr. Edwin Vieira, Stanley Mon­teith, Patrick Wood, G.Edward Griffin, Tom DeWeese, Michael Coffman and Chuck Baldwin. Sus­tain­able Devel­ope­ment. Eugenics and let’s not forget George Soros!
    One does not need a Col­lege degree in putting these pieces together. Just a little dis­cern­ment per­haps, and patiently follow the links and con­nect the dots.
    It has taken me about three years, via research, to learn exactly what the global elitist agenda is. I’m from the UK and I knew nothing about Amer­ican polit­ical His­tory till around 2008. I did two semes­ters in Col­lege and dropped out because I could not afford to con­tinue fur­ther, so excep­tional intel­lec­tual abil­i­ties and an Ivy– League edu­ca­tion are not needed to find these answers.
    How­ever, an enquiring mind and a good deal of patience are needed if you really want to find the right answers.

  4. Eugene DeFalco November 11, 2011 at 7:15 pm #

    All of what is said here is true. But just what can the average person do about it?

  5. Patrick Wood November 11, 2011 at 7:25 pm #

    Start a knowl­edge rev­o­lu­tion. Take papers like this, print them, and give them out every­where. Ask people to “prove this guy wrong.” Go to public meet­ings and “stir the pot”. Fight local pro­grams like Agenda 21, ICLEI, Smart Growth, Smart Meters, etc. Stick to the issues alone, not personalities.

  6. albert w loescher November 11, 2011 at 7:38 pm #

    Monteith’s ‘Broth­er­hood of Dark­ness’, Flynn’s ‘The Hope of the Wicked’, and Estulin’s ‘Bilder­bergers’ dis­sect the intra­cies of the OWD (Old World Dis­order) but say nearly nothing of the 1.7 bil­lion massif of islam. Baldwin, Barn­hardt and Jefress have much to to say of the ‘the reli­gion of pieces’.
    awl

  7. Patrick Wood November 11, 2011 at 9:39 pm #

    Yes, and one of my col­leagues, Carl Teichrib, is also a very author­i­ta­tive source on global reli­gion and how it is being used by the global elite. See him at http://www.forcingchange.com

  8. MyKisa November 12, 2011 at 4:26 am #

    be a sign post to others, when more are educated..,we push beack

  9. Steve November 12, 2011 at 7:23 am #

    Excel­lent article, Patrick.
    UN Agenda 21 is the imple­men­ta­tion tool of this New World Order of bankster con­trol. Kind of negates the meaning of Veteran’s Day.….…
    Good luck, Comrade.

  10. Indiana November 12, 2011 at 11:10 am #

    There is really only one thing to do… everyone, but mostly the middle class cit­i­zens, need to with­draw their funds from pen­sions, invest­ments, 401K’s, banks, etc. Do you realize that if this was accom­plished throughout the world, that the mar­kets would tumble and the rich elite would be left with zero wealth. These few rich rep­re­sent 1% of the world’s pop­u­la­tion; funds from the 99% are being used to manip­u­late and con­trol the mar­kets leading to their own greed, inter­ests and wealth.

  11. Sam Lehman November 12, 2011 at 8:11 pm #

    http://www.forcingchange.com has nothing to do with Carl Teichrib, but a “godaddy” web­site, selling domains or some­thing. What’s the deal?

  12. Patrick Wood November 12, 2011 at 8:43 pm #

    Mea culpa — it’s http://www.forcingchange.org

  13. Kumar Raj November 14, 2011 at 11:47 am #

    You will with­draw that money which was cre­ated against debt by the same super rich. NO USE!

    The con­trol of cre­ating money must be with gov­ern­ment rep­re­sented by the majority of the people. Not a dozen super rich Oli­garch Families!!!

  14. Kumar Raj November 14, 2011 at 11:48 am #

    Good work Patrick…the Lord’s days are near!

  15. BillybonesIII November 15, 2011 at 3:12 pm #

    I can remember hearing a UBC professor((that’s Uni­ver­sity of British Columbia for those who aren’t aware of any­thing north of the 49th par­allel)) talking about the tri lat­eral com­mis­sion back in the 60’s or 70’s. His name was Ben Met­calfe. Anyone remember him? I remember saying, tri-who? Many of the movers and shakers in pol­i­tics were mem­bers. USA and Canada. These guys have been shaping our poli­cies and eco­nomics for years. These bas­tards have been oper­ating behind the gov­ern­ment scenes for decades. Like snakes, they slither in between the big oil and pharceu­tical lob­by­ists. Some were actu­ally elected. Nobody paid any atten­tion to them. Cer­tainly not the media. And cer­tainly not the CBC, over­paid with mil­lions of tax payer dol­lars.
    Now, all we can do is talk, or write about them. They don’t care. That’s how big and pow­erful they’ve become. They have won this battle. They have all the chips.
    It’s all part of some­thing bigger. Get right with God.

  16. Mr. Sunset November 16, 2011 at 5:11 pm #

    Stay Liquid.

  17. Marie November 17, 2011 at 8:19 am #

    Edu­ca­tion and God are the answers. For many of us our reach is not large, but still we have to spread the truth of what is hap­pening! Join with others, spread the word via any agency you have avail­able… e-mail, news sites, Face­book, speak out at the meat counter in the gro­cery store! We all have a voice and so many know there is a problem but not where it comes from! Edu­cate them. And Pray!

  18. Clarence Dember November 20, 2011 at 8:50 pm #

    Thanks for this. (None dare call it conspiracy. )

  19. ken November 21, 2011 at 7:29 pm #

    What does god have to do with any­thing . it is irrel­e­vant ‚where was he in ww2 when all those people went to death camps ??? and so on. no offence intended

  20. Grieving American November 22, 2011 at 3:23 pm #

    They aren’t using “OUR” money for much of any­thing. It’s THEIR coun­ter­feit money. The whole thing is coun­ter­feit and will be, until they have us all where they want us. Con­trolled, cash­less, com­pliant, or dead.

  21. Craig Stelck November 24, 2011 at 11:36 am #

    Thanks Stan, do you feel like you are living like the main char­acter in Inva­sion of the Body Snatchers? The guy is trying to alert people about the Pod People and he just gets blank stares or like the eloi in The Time Machine. I believe a huge event is coming to amerikah soon. I was told by a very studied person 20 years ago that when the public starts reading and learning about the NWO, the NWo would make a huge move to finish their plans. Maybe it’s just know starting with the OWS useful idiots oth­er­wise know as TURDS (Totally Use­less Rad­i­cal­ized Deranged Socialist’s). One of my rants is that the gov­ern­ment schools don’t teach a dollar’s worth of infor­ma­tion as to how the banking elite run the gang­ster­ment. Never once does anyone in the fake news ask who Greenspan, Bernake, or Geitner work for. It’s against Fed­eral Law for the cit­i­zens to know who owns them as debt slaves the second they are born. Our cit­i­zens live in a con­trolled vaccum and the test results are all in now with country bank­rupt beyond any known math. One last ques­tion, are you Dr. Stan from Mon­terey, Ca?

  22. James November 30, 2011 at 2:15 pm #

    Don’t you find it strange that before the truth about the root cause of our prob­lems (NWO) gains any real trac­tion, up pops the OWS move­ment, which serves to dis­credit any accu­sa­tions, even when sup­ported by evi­dence, that there are Secret Groups behind Wall Street, con­sisting of Elite Bankers and their NWO cheer­leaders. Groups with trea­so­nous self-serving agenda’s, which are a grave threat to our country. Groups which have been accused of assisting/coordinating the 9/11 attack on our country.

    They say “truth can be stranger than fic­tion”, and we all know that once dis­cred­ited, a truth is gen­er­ally per­ceived as fic­tion. The NWO group with their media ten­ta­cles are suc­cess­fully staying one step ahead of any pos­sible derail­ment of their agenda, they have been patient and strategic. But now I fear, they are ready to move beyond 9/11 with even bigger things. If they are willing to go the lengths many believe they have gone, don’t you think have con­tin­gency plans for those of us that “won’t let it be”. According to web rumor, and quite a bit of ver­i­fi­able evi­dence, FEMA will be coming for those of us who are aware and any attempt to pre­pare can be inter­preted as ter­rorism. A bill is cur­rently in Con­gress today that will strip cit­i­zens of all their Con­sti­tu­tional Rights on the basis of being labeled by the gov­ern­ment, a “ter­rorist”, no evi­dence required, just 9 little let­ters next to YOUR name.

    Looks like they have all the bases covered…good luck fellow Patriots, we will all need it! Short of electing Ron Paul in a known “fixed” system, and keeping him safe to dis­mantle their work, “we the people” are not just bank­rupt, we lost our country as well.

  23. Thomas December 16, 2011 at 1:11 pm #

    No offense meant, Ken but your com­ment, “What does god have to do with any­thing?” is a ques­tion that many struggle with and turn away from seeking the True and Living God, not the little god of this world. The ‘ruler of this world’ is the entity who showed the Son of God all the king­doms of the world in a moment of time, and said to him, “To you I will give all this authority and their glory, for it has been deliv­ered to me, and I give it to whom I will. If you, then, will wor­ship me, it will all be yours.” When the Son of God refused, the ‘ruler of this world departed from him until a more oppor­tune time. Read the gospel of Luke.

    Order from Chaos, Ordo ab Chaos. Chaos increases and so soon will be the rising of ‘die Schwarze Sonne’, the Black Sun.

    Thanks, Patrick. Excel­lent work.

  24. William December 28, 2011 at 1:18 pm #

    Great article and if there are any good math­e­mati­cians the sec­tion of the 3 researchers in Switzer­land is compelling.

    Here is the failure in America, we did not read and fully under­stand and apply our Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence. If you re-read it again in a new time and read the orig­inal draft you can see how Thomas Jef­ferson never allowed the truths not to be exposed and this is impor­tant to get.

    This one doc­u­ment is instru­mental because it is the whole basis of deci­sion to sup­port life, (what are we?) The con­sti­tu­tion is a con­struct to sup­port Lib­erty within this doc­u­ment. By this full under­standing the per­ver­sion of the Con­sti­tu­tion is not pos­sible, but take out the 3 prin­ci­pals listed, do not make choices based upon this and Thomas Jefferson’s warn­ings become in full view. Him and many others were very spe­cific about the Financiers because in their own time they saw and expe­ri­enced it first hand.

    First of all, force is per­sis­tence and choice, the more choice per­sis­tent in a direc­tion will be dom­i­nant. Who are the choice makers of all life? You are, this force as well this fact cou­pled with under­standing in a united direc­tion increases with every deci­sion in the direction.

    What is the direc­tion intended by the framers? A Republic, this is where indi­vid­uals in public are allowed to be heard, to dis­play and per­form answers others may use to improve their own lives. Essen­tially it is Life in sup­port of life but not knowing this makes it hard for life to be in full sup­port of such an activity if all the direc­tions you turn are filled with lies.

    This is a very short ver­sion and there is more where this came from, but your lesson today is re-read the Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence with the stance or under­standing as a doc­u­ment of truths to decide from in the direc­tion of a Republic with life sup­porting life as the acts by each of us.

    Learn to decide on such a basis, learn to be entirely per­sis­tent and I and others will teach you how to break the backs of Financiers and the lies that have pushed upon you. It is your choice and look around you right now and pick out some­thing that was not achieved by choice, what is it?
    Ready up pil­grim we got work to do.

    Gen­uinely,
    William
    A Pro­ducing American

  25. Sanford Aranoff January 3, 2012 at 5:52 pm #

    One of the 613 com­mand­ments that the Israelis (Chris­tians incor­rectly trans­late it as Israelites) received from Mt. Sinai is the com­mand that the king shall not have too many horses. The gov­ern­ment is per­mitted to levy taxes so that the king shall have some horses, but not too much. What is too much? The Hebrew Bible explains that if there are two polit­ical par­ties, we are to choose, i.e., vote, for the party advo­cating lower taxes. This is clar­i­fied by what hap­pened after King Solomon died, when his suc­cessor had to choose between two par­ties. One party con­sisted of wise people advo­cating lower taxes, and the other “childish” party high taxes. The king chose the higher taxes with cat­a­strophic results. The Torah says we have a choice between good and evil, and com­mands us to choose (vote) the good. The Bible is as clear and explicit as pos­sible in urging voting for Republicans.

    Of course, Jews tra­di­tion­ally have sup­ported Democ­rats. Jews are stub­born. During the time of Moses, the Israelis wanted to return to sta­tist Egypt, where the gov­ern­ment gave them their basic food and other needs. Moses was so exas­per­ated that he wanted to resign his lead­er­ship, saying, “Remove me from your book!” Today Jews encourage voting Democ­rats saying a Jewish oblig­a­tion is “Tikun Olam”. We Jews accept the idea that the best way to help the world is to follow Torah prin­ci­ples, not Pro­gres­sivism. Lim­ited cen­tral gov­ern­ment is a fun­da­mental Torah idea, as Samuel explained in his sermon against the estab­lish­ment of a monarchy. The Talmud clar­i­fies this fur­ther, saying the highest form of charity is helping someone help them­selves. Pro­gres­sivism thwarts this, while lim­ited gov­ern­ment with max­imum freedom helps people help themselves.

    See the new book Rational Thinking, Gov­ern­ment Poli­cies, Sci­ence, and Living. Rational thinking starts with clearly stated prin­ci­ples, con­tinues with log­ical deduc­tions, and then exam­ines empir­ical evi­dence to pos­sibly modify the principles.

  26. Craig Stelck October 11, 2012 at 2:55 pm #

    That has been on my mind for a long time. Crush them by not doing busi­ness with any of their banks or cor­po­ra­tions. it would work until they cre­ated a crises like a fake nuke attack in some city. Sure would be fun to bank­rupt them.

  27. Craig Stelck October 11, 2012 at 3:00 pm #

    Get right with God?? Sadly God let’s his own get mur­dered before Jesus, during Jesus, and after Jesus. I have won­dered about that most of my life. Anyway the TL hand picked gang is also inter­twined with the first Fed­eral Reserve think tank called the Council on For­eign Rela­tions. Every admin­is­tra­tion is stacked with these mem­bers both TL and CFR. The New World Order was up and run­ning since it started in 1922 with the CFR. I can only guess what misery these vam­pires are plan­ning for the peasants.

  28. Craig Stelck October 11, 2012 at 3:02 pm #

    Is that what Bruce Lee said or do you mean grab your surfboard?

  29. Craig Stelck October 11, 2012 at 3:03 pm #

    I wonder how much gold the owners of the Fed­eral Reserve were able to con­fis­cate over the years as they were bank­rupting the country.

  30. Craig Stelck October 11, 2012 at 3:06 pm #

    Michael Savage and Mark Levin know every player in TL, CFR New World Order but never touch it on their radio shows. I wish they could lay it out for the listeners.

  31. Craig Stelck October 11, 2012 at 3:10 pm #

    Patric, I have won­dered prob­ably cor­rectly if the blood­line banking fam­i­lies and their par­a­site gov­ern­ment allies go to a school like Hog­warts after col­lege to learn how to manip­u­late coun­tries and their citizens.

  32. Patrick Wood October 11, 2012 at 3:22 pm #

    Yes, Savage does because he enthu­si­as­ti­cally read exerpts on air from one of my papers a couple of years ago… how­ever not a word more, nor did he ever con­tact me directly. It’s like someone called him and said drop Wood and his publications.

  33. Marc Herlands November 3, 2012 at 2:07 pm #

    you are stupid. the elite picks the best and the brightest to do their work. you may not like it, pawn, but it is the truth. and yes, pres­i­dents and fed chairmen are impor­tant, just as mem­bers of the tlc and banks and the bilds are too. it is a small elite of a few thou­sand people who must run th world’s busi­ness and gov­ern­ments by con­sensus. so do not be arro­gant and snide. you are exhibiting the mind of the minnow who thinks itself bigger and wiser than the huge shark. beware of your own shortcomings.

  34. Marc Herl November 3, 2012 at 2:24 pm #

    yes. They sup­port Har­vard University’s School of Eco­nomics and the London School of Eco­nomics. Rhodes Schol­ar­ships seem to be a good place to be groomed as well. Very intel­li­gent, loqua­tious, ambi­tious, greedy, very broad minded, civic ori­ented, amoral are the kinds of people they want. In other words, it’s still noblesse oblige. They are not Stalin, Hitler or mad dic­ta­tors. They want pro­duc­tivity and sta­bility and wealth. War­fare is used to gain power. But, they are not sup­portive of geno­cide as a tactic.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Real News for Friday, November 11th | In The World Not Of It - November 11, 2011

    […] The Tri­lat­eral Commissions’(Globalist Think-tank) Influ­ence In the Eurozone […]

  2. bankväldet måste få ett slut « - November 11, 2011

    […] Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion influ­ence in the Euro­zone “Here’s what you need to know about the cur­rent crisis in the Euro­zone. The big time banksters are get­ting direct hands on control: […]

  3. Governo Tecnico - Pagina 5 - I Forum di Investireoggi - November 11, 2011

    […] […]

  4. Anonymous - November 11, 2011

    […] 6 out of 7 President/Vice Pres­i­dent elec­tions Could any sane person think that they Tri­lat­erals just stum­bled into all of these posi­tions? Of course not. The his­tor­ical evi­dence declares that the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion hijacked the global polit­ical system for the exact pur­poses it stated in 1973. That is, to “foster a New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order.” Just who rules the world economy? When Antony Sutton and myself studied the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion in 1978, one ana­lyt­ical tech­nique we used was a deriv­a­tive of soci­ology called “net­work topology.” We assem­bled names of direc­tors, exec­u­tives and major share­holders of com­pa­nies asso­ci­ated with the Tri­lat­erals and then dia­grammed them to show over­laps and other non-obvious asso­ci­a­tions. Our results were stun­ning. We found a tight inter­locking net­work that was far stronger than a bunch of inde­pen­dent com­pa­nies. In graph­ical form, the net­work was clearly vis­ible. (See Tri­lat­erals Over Wash­ington, Volume I) Recently, three researchers in Switzer­land (S. Vitali, J.B. Glat­tfelder, and S. Bat­tiston) have released a sim­ilar and modern study called “The net­work of global cor­po­rate con­trol.” In the abstract they state, “We find that transna­tional cor­po­ra­tions form a giant bow-tie struc­ture and that a large por­tion of con­trol flows to a small tightly-knit core of finan­cial insti­tu­tions. This core can be seen as an eco­nomic “super-entity” that raises new impor­tant issues both for researchers and policy makers.” This is an under­state­ment. In Table S1 buried in the appendix, they list the “top 50 control-holders,” where share­holders are ranked according to their level of net­work con­trol. These are the com­pa­nies who com­prise the inner-core of global con­trol. Of the 50 com­pa­nies, 45 are banks, insur­ance or other finan­cial insti­tu­tions. From the U.S. we see the usual: State Street, JP Morgan Chase, B of A, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and others. In short, this core of banks/financials are the real rulers of the world economy. There is no spec­u­la­tion here: This is hard and com­pelling evi­dence. This is also the exact same con­clu­sion that Sutton and I reached in 1978 with more rudi­men­tary, non-computerized analysis. The report con­cludes, “This is the first time a ranking of eco­nomic actors by global con­trol is pre­sented. Notice that many actors belong to the finan­cial sector (NACE codes starting with 65,66,67) and many of the names are well-known global players. The interest of this ranking is not that it exposes unsus­pected pow­erful players. Instead, it shows that many of the top actors belong to the core. This means that they do not carry out their busi­ness in iso­la­tion but, on the con­trary, they are tied together in an extremely entan­gled web of con­trol. This finding is extremely impor­tant since there was no prior eco­nomic theory or empir­ical evi­dence regarding whether and how top players are con­nected. Finally, it should be noted that gov­ern­ments and nat­ural per­sons are only fea­tured fur­ther down in the list.” Zbig­niew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion with David Rock­e­feller in 1973, summed up the “net­work” in his 1970 Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Tech­netronic Era: “The nation-­state as a fun­da­mental unit of man’s orga­nized life has ceased to be the prin­cipal cre­ative force: Inter­na­tional banks and multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions are acting and plan­ning in terms that are far in advance of the polit­ical con­cepts of the nation-state.” Unfor­tu­nately, this is the reality of the matter. With inter­na­tional banks at the center and var­ious multi­na­tional com­pa­nies in the periphery, the net­work con­tinues to dom­i­nate and con­trol the course of world events. The cit­i­zens of the respec­tive coun­tries are little more than objects to be taxed and manip­u­lated. In Europe, the finan­cial demise of Italy and Greece threatens to melt down the Euro­pean region, if not the entire global economy. That Tri­lat­eral bankers Papademos and Monti, respec­tively, would take the helm as Prime Min­ister of their own nation-state should be likened to be a receiver­ship move designed to pro­tect the assets of the banks (the “Net­work”) they rep­re­sent. If nothing else, it cer­tainly shows that the Tri­lat­eral hege­mony over Europe is alive and well. .… by P. Wood Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion influ­ence in the Euro­zone | August Fore­cast & Review […]

  5. Trilateral Commission influence in the Eurozone – Infowars Ireland - November 12, 2011

    […] influ­ence in the Euro­zone 13/11/2011Featured , Glob­al­istsNo com­ments   by Patrick Wood August Fore­cast 11 November 2011  Speaking of his Tri­lat­eral Commission’s influ­ence in the original […]

  6. Trilateral Commission influence in the Eurozone | The Irish Timez - Breaking the truth from Ireland ... - November 13, 2011

    […] Patrick WoodAu­gust Fore­cast 11 November 2011 […]

  7. Trilateral Commission influence in the Eurozone « A NATION BEGUILED - November 14, 2011

    […] http://www.augustforecast.com/2011/11/11/trilateral-commission-influence-in-the-eurozone/ […]

  8. Trilateral Commission influence in the Eurozone « thefloridianguy.com - November 15, 2011

    […] http://www.augustforecast.com/2011/11/11/trilateral-commission-influence-in-the-eurozone/ This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 16th, 2011 at 2:24 am and is filed under New World Order News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or track­back from your own site. […]

  9. Candidates Merry Go Around « Precinct368cor's Weblog - November 16, 2011

    […] so all Assets go to them the cen­tral­iza­tion of Power Grab­bers as its hap­pening now with their next World banking Col­lapse Orques­tra­tion. More on why (get­ting rid of Nation States and Sov­er­eignty) “Zbig¬niew Brzezinski, co-founder […]

  10. Findings & Forecasts 04/10/2013 | August Forecast & Review - April 10, 2013

    […] I wrote in Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion Influ­ence in the Euro­pean Union in 2011, Com­mis­sion co-founder David Rock­e­feller readily boasted of their influ­ence in […]

Powered by Patriot's Web