VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Print This Article Print This Article Email This Article Email This Article

Findings & Forecasts 10/03/2012

Share

Economy

Cal­i­fornia is usu­ally the state that leads the nation in social, eco­nomic and polit­ical trends, and that’s why it deserves to be watched so closely. Munic­ipal bank­rupt­cies in Stockton, San Bernardino and Mam­moth Lakes, for instance, led Moody’s to con­clude in August, “more bank­ruptcy fil­ings and bond defaults among Cal­i­fornia cities, reflecting the increased risk to bond­holders as investors are asked to con­tribute to plans for closing budget gaps.” Munic­i­pal­i­ties across the nation are in under the same kind of duress.

The above table, from the IAR Inland Empire Report on Busi­ness for Sep­tember, is an eye opener. The Inland Empire is rep­re­sented by San Bernardino and River­side coun­ties, and is one of the most impor­tant eco­nomic areas in the state. Note that num­bers above 50 rep­re­sent expan­sion and those below 50 indi­cate contraction.

Local PMI, or Pur­chasing Manager’s Index, went from increasing in August to sharp neg­a­tive con­trac­tion in Sep­tember. Pro­duc­tion, also increasing in August, plunged from 55.0 to 37.5 in Sep­tember. New Orders also plunged, as did exports.

Employ­ment had increased in August, but went seri­ously neg­a­tive in Sep­tember by drop­ping to 44.6 from 52.

Granted that the Inland Empire is a very small slice of America as a whole, but as a leading indi­cator, it is falling off the cliff. Even if August had been an encour­aging sign of recovery, Sep­tember was slammed back into recession.

The PMI chart shows the decline starting in April 2012 — it has fallen like a rock with only two upward blips along the way. Is this a pic­ture of eco­nomic recovery? Hardly. In fact, these kinds of num­bers defy the national pic­ture pre­sented by the Fed­eral government.

The global economy is doing no better. Europe is now offi­cially back into reces­sion, with the only notable excep­tion being Ger­many. Euro­zone unem­ploy­ment has reached a record high of 11.4 per­cent, but dig­ging deeper reveals a dis­turbing pic­ture. Youth unem­ploy­ment in the EU is 22.8 per­cent. Overall unem­ploy­ment in Spain is 25.1 per­cent, but 52.9 per­cent of youth 25 or under are out of work.

France’s latest PMI chart is notice­ably sim­ilar to the Inland Empire except that the most recent peak occurred about 9 months earlier.

France’s newly-elected prime min­ister François Hol­lande, a rad­ical socialist, has led the country in the oppo­site direc­tion of recovery by imple­menting severe aus­terity pro­grams (dic­tated by the EU itself) while simul­ta­ne­ously increasing taxes. The policy is already having dis­as­trous effects.

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wrote in The Tele­graph on Sunday, “Another domino falls as Hol­lande pushes France into depression”,

“Data col­lected by Simon Ward at Hen­derson Global Investors shows that a key leading indi­cator of the money supply –‘six-month real M1 money’ — is now con­tracting even faster in France than in Spain. The shock will hit over the winter.” [emphasis added]

Whether Hol­lande under­stands defla­tion is unknown, but he is playing right into its hands. Ambrose concludes,

France now joins Italy, Spain, Por­tugal, Greece, Ire­land, and parts of Eastern Europe in syn­chro­nized tight­ening, with the Nether­lands and Bel­gium cut­ting too, all drag­ging each other down in a 1930s slide into the polit­ical swamp.”

Whether one looks at Europe or the U.S., the edge of the eco­nomic abyss is the same, and both are headed that way. There are no gov­ern­ment poli­cies that can reverse or fore­stall the journey.

The Fed’s QE3 pro­gram of pur­chasing $40 bil­lion in Trea­suries per month has nothing to do with eco­nomic recovery or cre­ating jobs: It is a panic move to stave off mon­e­tary defla­tion which is already underway. This move is des­tined to fail just like all pre­vious attempts have failed: The banksters will avoid insol­vency but few others will see any cash.

Tech­noc­racy

Those of us who voiced con­cerns and crit­i­cism over the Depart­ment of Home­land Security/FBI imple­men­ta­tion of so-called Fusion Cen­ters around the U.S., were rou­tinely dis­missed as alarmists and irrel­e­vant. Now the chickens have come home to roost with national head­lines over the scan­dalous results pro­duced by these uncon­sti­tu­tional spy centers.

The reason it hit the news is due to a damning report issued by the Senate Home­land Secu­rity and Gov­ern­mental Affairs that declares in its Exec­u­tive Sum­mary on page one,

“Sharing terrorism-related infor­ma­tion between state, local and fed­eral offi­cials is cru­cial to pro­tecting the United States from another ter­rorist attack. Achieving this objec­tive was the moti­va­tion for Con­gress and the White House to invest hun­dreds of mil­lions of tax­payer dol­lars over the last nine years in sup­port of dozens of state and local fusion cen­ters across the United States. Con­gress directed the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­rity (DHS) to lead this ini­tia­tive. A bipar­tisan inves­ti­ga­tion by the Per­ma­nent Sub­com­mittee on Inves­ti­ga­tions has found, how­ever, that DHS’ work with those state and local fusion cen­ters has not pro­duced useful intel­li­gence to sup­port fed­eral coun­tert­er­rorism efforts.

“The Sub­com­mittee inves­ti­ga­tion found that DHS-assigned detailees to the fusion cen­ters for­warded “intel­li­gence” of uneven quality – often­times shoddy, rarely timely, some­times endan­gering cit­i­zens’ civil lib­er­ties and Pri­vacy Act pro­tec­tions, occa­sion­ally taken from already-published public sources, and more often than not unre­lated to ter­rorism.” [emphasis added]

Starting in 2003, DHS has cre­ated 73 Fusion Cen­ters in the U.S., but actual loca­tions in each state were kept secret until early 2011. Cen­ters were to com­bine Fed­eral and local law enforce­ment resources along with pri­vate par­ties involved in public infra­struc­ture, in order to suck data from every pos­sible local source for com­put­er­ized analysis.

What­ever Con­gress had in mind, it was NOT what DHS pro­ceeded to do, namely, create a behe­moth cit­izen spying exper­i­ment that was run without over­sight and a vir­tu­ally unlim­ited budget. DHS cannot recon­struct how much money they actu­ally spent, where it was spent and to whom it was given, but it is esti­mated to be a multi­bil­lion dollar boondoggle.

The gist of “data fusion” is this: Take data from many diverse areas and data­bases, com­bine it into a single data­base (the “fusion” process) and then apply heuristic (arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence) pro­gram algo­rithms that infer who the bad guys might be. The problem is that it doesn’t work and ordi­nary, inno­cent cit­i­zens are easily pegged for being “sus­pi­cious” and then watched for crim­inal behavior.

While Fusion Cen­ters failed Con­gress, they have not failed the Tech­nocrats within DHS. Tech­niques and tech­nology for data col­lec­tion and com­puter analysis have advanced by leaps and bounds and are now ready for prime-time imple­men­ta­tion on a more com­pre­hen­sive nation­wide basis.

As the National Secu­rity Agency (NSA) com­pletes its $2 bil­lion mon­ster data center in Bluff­dale, Utah by the end of 2013, it will be ready to run a new gen­er­a­tion of soft­ware on its mas­sive array of super-computers. Plans for the data center include 100,000 square feet just for com­puters and an addi­tional 900,000 feet for other office space — that’s 23 acres of office space on 240 acres of fenced and guarded secret compound.

U.S. Army Gen­eral Keith Alexander, who heads the NSA as well as the U.S. Cyber Com­mand, insisted in July 2012 that the data center will NOT be used to spy on Amer­ican cit­i­zens: “We don’t store data on U.S. cit­i­zens… That’s baloney. … That’s ludicrous.”

When­ever I hear this kind of rhetoric, espe­cially when no sup­porting evi­dence is offered, I know for cer­tain that the oppo­site is most likely true: NSA will assemble the largest col­lec­tion of cit­izen data in his­tory. It will be the “mother of all fusion centers.”

— —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — –  Note: Addi­tional con­tent on this page is avail­able only to Pre­mium sub­scribers of Find­ings & Fore­casts.
To sub­scribe, please click here. Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

3 Responses to “Findings & Forecasts 10/03/2012”

  1. Craig Stelck says:

    At least the genius’s are feeling up old white women and young ado­les­cent white girls at the air­port terminal’s. Our gang­ster­ment is hor­rible beyond descrip­tion and half our cit­i­zens have had NPR-MSNBC-ABC-CNN cra­nial rectal reversals.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Brenda says:

    What your saying Mr. P is that our country is finding out too much, so we are get­ting rid of the informers because it scares you that we are fining out?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Patrick Wood says:

    Not quite fol­lowing your question.

    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Premium Subscriber Access

Email:
Password:
Remember   

Forgot Password

People want to know…

faq

What is Globalization?

It is the col­lective effect of pur­poseful and amoral manip­u­la­tion that seeks to cen­tralize eco­nomic, polit­ical, tech­no­log­ical and soci­etal forces in order to accrue max­imum profit and polit­ical power to global banks, global cor­po­ra­tions and the elit­ists who run them. It is rapidly moving toward an full and final imple­men­ta­tion of Technocracy.

Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Posted in: faq

What is the Tri­lat­eral Commission?

Founded in 1973 by David Rock­e­feller and Zbig­niew Brzezinski, the Com­mis­sion set out to create a “New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order”, namely, Tech­noc­racy. The orig­inal mem­ber­ship con­sisted of elit­ists (bankers, politi­cians, aca­d­e­mics, indus­tri­al­ists) from Japan, North America and Europe. Col­lec­tively, they have dom­i­nated and con­trolled trade and eco­nomic policy in their respec­tive coun­tries since at least 1974.

Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Posted in: faq

What is Technocracy?

Tech­noc­racy is a move­ment started in the 1930’s by engi­neers, sci­en­tists and tech­ni­cians that pro­posed the replace­ment of cap­i­talism with an energy-based economy. Orig­i­nally envi­sioned for North America only, it is now being applied on a global basis. Authors Aldous Huxley and George Orwell believed that Tech­noc­racy would result in a Sci­en­tific Dic­ta­tor­ship, as reflected in their books, “Brave New World” and “1984″.

Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Posted in: faq

What is Smart Grid?

Smart Grid is the national and global imple­men­ta­tion of dig­ital and Wi-fi enabled power meters that enable com­mu­ni­ca­tion between the appli­ances in your home or busi­ness, with the power provider. This pro­vides con­trol over your appli­ances and your usage of elec­tricity, gas and water.

Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Posted in: faq

Who is M. King Hubbert?

Hub­bert was a geo-physicist who co-founded Tech­noc­racy, Inc. in 1932 and authored its Tech­noc­racy Study Course. In 1954, he became the cre­ator of the “Peak Oil Theory”, or “Hubbert’s Peak” which the­o­rized that the world was rapidly run­ning out of carbon-based fuels. Hub­bert is widely con­sid­ered as a “founding father” of the global warming and green movements.

Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Posted in: faq

Who is R. Buck­min­ster Fuller?

A pio­neer in global eco­log­ical theory, Fuller (1895 – 1984) was the first to sug­gest the devel­op­ment of a Global Energy Grid that is today known as the Global Smart Grid. Fuller is widely con­sid­ered to be a “founding father” of the global green move­ment, including global warming, Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment, Agenda 21, etc.

Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Posted in: faq

Is the Venus Project like Technocracy?

The Venus Project, founded by Jacque Fresco, is a utopian, modern-day iter­a­tion of Tech­noc­racy. Like Tech­noc­racy, it scraps cap­i­talism and pro­poses that “a resource-based economy all of the world’s resources are held as the common her­itage of all of Earth’s people, thus even­tu­ally out­growing the need for the arti­fi­cial bound­aries that sep­a­rate people.” The appli­ca­tion of tech­nology is the answer to all of the world’s prob­lems, including war, famine and poverty.

Find­ings & Fore­casts 10/03/2012, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating

Posted in: faq