Green Economics
I have been writing for several years now that the global elite are planning to implement a Technocracy-oriented economic system that will turn our existing capitalistic economic system upside-down. Why? Because it will be based on ENERGY instead of MONEY.
The Trojan horse that is enabling Technocracy is “Green Energy.” You already know that green is on the lips of just about every politician in the world. Obama kick-started the conversion of America’s energy grid into a “Smart Grid” that will control energy consumption down to the appliance level in your home and business. Public money is recklessly thrown down a rabbit hole into green companies like Solyndra. Europe is obsessed with green and sustainable development.
In his second inauguration speech, Obama stated,
“We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition; we must lead it.”
At the annual World Economic Forum summit meeting currently taking place in Davos, Switzerland, the first major headline to be produced is: Davos call for $14 trillion ‘greening’ of global economy. This is an amount larger than the entire global economy. The organization behind the pronouncement is the Green Growth Action Alliance. Who are they and who belongs to it?
The Green Growth Action Alliance was commissioned at last year’s Davos meeting, and is headed by former Mexican president Felipe Calderon. Alliance global banking members include: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays Capital, Deutsche Bank Group, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Investment Bank, Grupo Financiero Banorte, HSBC, Inter-American Development Bank, Morgan Stanley, World Bank Group. Other industry members include: Accenture, Alcatel-Lucent, Applied Materials, Environmental Defense Fund, GE Energy, Infosys, McKinsey & Company, Samsung Electronics Company, Siemens, World Trade Organization.
This is a “who’s who” list of global giants. They, among other global movers and shakers, are collectively screaming for the world to turn “green”, all of it predicated on the unproven theory called Global Warming.
Given that the science behind global warming is riddled with fraudulent data and predetermined “studies” skewed by grants from these same organizations, what is the real agenda behind all this hoopla?
Technocracy.
The doctrine of Technocracy was first formalized in the 1930′s by M. King Hubbard at Columbia University, who later proposed the “Peak Oil Theory”, or Hubbard’s Peak. It sought to balance consumption with production based on an energy formula instead of supply-and-demand economics. Money would be discarded for energy credits. Society would be run by enlightened and unelected scientists and engineers (governance), replacing representative governments. There would be no private property or ability to accumulate wealth. People would be herded, managed and directed like cattle in a feed lot.
Hubbard, et al, believed that technology had caused an organic change in society, which could only then be run by the technological experts. They viewed politicians as ignorant and even dangerous, unable to understand the technology they were supposed to manage.
This elite thinking has persisted, not only in halls of academia, but in the industrial world where technology and managerism already reigns. At the core of this elitist philosophy is Scientism, and I offer the following definition.
Scientism: An extension of Positivism based on a mixture of pseudo-science and empirical science that states that science alone, with its self-selected priesthood of engineers and scientists, is the only source of truth about the nature of man, the physical world and universal reality. By definition it rejects the existence of God and all notions of divine truth as is found in the Bible.
A caveat is necessary. All scientists are not accused of Scientism. There are plenty (if not a majority) of scientists, engineers and technicians who accept the notion of divine and/or absolute truth outside of science. Unfortunately, these are looked upon as heretics by adherents to Scientism, and are largely ignored. For instance, 31,000 scientists signed a petition that rejects the pseudo-science of global warming, but this has not deterred the Al Gores’ of the world, including Obama, from marketing global warming as if it were a scientific fact!
If Technocracy is the application of science to the economic system, then its Siamese twin is Transhumanism, which is the application of science to the condition of man in order to achieve characteristics of immortality, omniscience and omnipresence, among others, and to produce a God-like race of post-humans.
Because of the vocal rise of Transhumanism, you now routinely hear calls that immortality for humans is just around the corner, as is the case with Ray Kurzweil. Perhaps you missed the Time Magazine cover from February 21, 2011 issue pictured at the left.
Do you think this is all benevolent and benign? Think again. The religious evil that runs below the surface of anything connected to Scientism is of the greatest magnitude. It’s a dangerous philosophy for mankind in general, and especially to Bible-believing Christians in particular, because its adherents see themselves as gods, far above mere mortals of the uneducated classes.
For instance, a leading transhuman, cloning researcher and nuclear physicist, Dr. Richard Seed, stated pointedly in an interview for a documentary: “We are going to become Gods. Period. If you don’t like it, get off. You don’t have to contribute, you don’t have to participate. But if you’re going to interfere with ME becoming God, then we’ll have big trouble; we’ll have warfare. The only way to prevent me is to kill me. And you kill me, I’ll kill you.” [Dr. Richard Seed, Nuclear physicist and cloning researcher. Technocalyps, Part II — Preparing for the Singularity]. Yes, he said that; If you don’t believe it, go listen to the entire documentary. [https://itunes.apple.com/us/movie/technocalyps-pt.-2-preparing/id490742472]
Where is this leading? Scientism, Technocracy and Transhumanism are headed straight into a Scientific Dictatorship: That is, the utopian concept of scientific managerism whereby all facets of political, social and economic life are managed solely by the scientific method and dictates of science. If unchecked, it will put mankind back into the dark ages of a feudal society where a few own everything and have all the privileges while the rest own nothing and have zero privileges.
Furthermore, all of this is coming at us like an express train. Is anybody else paying attention? Apparently not, for I am still the only one harping on this week after week and month after month.
You are welcome to share this article with anyone who might want to see beyond the charade of modern global politics and scientific psycho-babble.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — –
Note: Additional content on this page is available only to Premium subscribers of Findings & Forecasts.
To subscribe, please click here.
This idea is the mega-horror show of the ages. Thank God, if you’re permitted, that it’s a grandiose illusion we seem to live in; that He can know nothing about. My friend, Edgar Allen Poe, had it right: “All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream”. The dream is appearing more scary all the time.
Faith is actually the danger while Doubt is far less dangerous. In the name of religious Faith good Christians burned witches at the stake, killed untold numbers of non-Christians
on their way to Jerusalem during the crusades, and did other terrible evils in the certainty that they were doing the Will of The All-Powerful. Good Christians invaded much of he world during he days of colonialism trying to convert Muslims who had little desire to convert and setting the stage for today’s Muslim anger which manifests in such terrible violence. Good Jews persecuted Benedict Spinoza, expelled huge numbers of Jews from their communities for refusing to believe as their brethren believed. In the name of their Faith Muslims reacting to the centuries of colonialism have committed dreadful acts of violence.
Atheism is also a Faith, a certainty that there is no Supreme Being, and, since this makes atheists regard religious Faith as a great evil it resulted in persecution of the religious by Commies and other atheist groups.
Doubt is different. No one does anything terrible because they doubt the existence of a Supreme Being. Doubt results in questioning and this helps to increase knowledge.
W.
One tiny correction. I believe that the global economy is about 60 Trillion while US GDP is about 14 – 16 Trillion, so I think the amount is about the same size as our entire economy. Either way it is ridiculous.
The problem is that they will make a demand like that and then people (politicians) will feel obligated to compromise and at least meet the demand part way. So instead of committing 14 Trillion we will commit hundreds of billions. It is an amount that we cannot afford, but the left will whine that it is less than a tenth of what is really needed. They will use the fact that hundreds of billions produced no results as “evidence” that they need much, much more. Because no results will ever be forthcoming, they will be a permanent drumbeat and drag on our economy.
They will achieve two basic aims with this strategy: The elite will tap into the majority of funds provided, so they will personally benefit, and the economies of any contributing countries will be hobbled, leading to an economic crisis large enough to require an “international” solution. A world economy will be formed which will allow even more control by the elites, require more global cooperation and pave the way for the enslavement of the masses of the Earth.
This much sited petition is itself a wonderful example of scientism. An examination of the petition found that the only requirement for signers was that they have a Bachelor of Science degree in any field. They did not have to be familiar at any level with climate science per se.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/news.php?n=158
This reminds me somewhat of my son’s protestation when he went to work at Twitter. He was told that his title was data scientist, and he loves to show his business card with that title. What he told the guy in personnel was, “I used to work at NASA. I worked with a lot of scientists there. I know what a scientist is. I am not a scientist.” Still, he has been declared a scientist, is listed in the employee directory as a scientist, and as such he could probably have signed the petition. He is a whiz bang code writer, but he knows nothing about climate science.
The point of the survey was to ask people who were able to think critically and who have some kind of science-related degree. There are tons of people touting global warming to do not have degrees in atmospheric science.
Remember that most of the so-called academic (pro) global warming studies have been funded by major participants such as the Carnegie Foundation and Rockefeller Brothers Fund. They were expected to produce the results that they produced. This is corruption, not science.
And the climate science skeptics have largely been funded by the hydrocarbon energy industry. Finding an unbiased study is probably difficult.
Actually, the funding of climate skeptics by hydrocarbon corporations is minuscule to the funding these same companies spend to combat “climate change.”
How much has Exxon given to climate skeptics? In 2009 it was reported to be about $16 million. Greenpeace reported the Koch Brothers funded climate skeptics to the amount $67 million since 1997.
All of the above seems like a lot of money, but Exxon funded the Stanford University Global Climate and Energy Project to the tune $100 million. And the American Petroleum Institute reports that the industry on a whole had invested $58 BILLION, from 2000 to 2008, on global warming research, carbon capture, and other climate change-related projects; often working hand-in-glove with major university climate programs.
And it’s not just U.S. companies. BP committed $500 million for an academic-based bioscience project dedicated to combating climate change. Saudi Aramco is pouring hundreds of millions into carbon capture and other global warming projects. Big money is being spent by Petro-Canada and other foreign oil companies on global warming-related programs.
And Exxon has favored a carbon tax proposal. The Western States Petroleum Association supports cap-and-trade, as does Chevron.
All that said, the funding of climate skeptics by big oil is laughable compared to the money they’re spending on global warming programs.
But why would petroleum corporations be so heavily invested in climate change projects and programs? Now that’s the question.