Tag Archive | "bankers"

Global bankers seek to raid taxpayers over subprime fiasco

Tags: , , ,


By Patrick Wood

Banking used to be simple. When you bor­rowed money from a bank, the bank owned your mort­gage and you paid the interest and prin­cipal directly. This is easily under­stood by this graphic representation:

 

Things got com­pli­cated when bankers got greedy, fig­uring the could make a whole lot more than just simple interest. The scheme is called secu­ri­ti­za­tion, as depicted by the fol­lowing flow-chart.

In its sim­plest terms, secu­ri­ti­za­tion is a process whereby illiquid finan­cial instru­ments (e.g., mort­gages) are pur­chased and com­bined into pools. The pool is then struc­tured where shares can be sold to 3rd party investors like banks, pen­sion funds and even gov­ern­ments. Any type of asset can be secu­ri­tized as long as it has a steady flow of cash asso­ci­ated with it. The cash flow is the incen­tive for pur­chasers to make their investment.

There are many fees that are paid along the road to suc­cessful secu­ri­ti­za­tion. The orig­inal bor­rower pays “points” to the ini­tial broker and/or banker. The pool oper­ator receives the rights to income at a dis­counted price. The invest­ment banker who syn­di­cates the sale charges hefty fees plus com­mis­sions paid to the selling broker/dealer or invest­ment representative.

The invest­ment bankers are the pri­mary enablers and dri­vers of the secu­ri­ti­za­tion process. Right behind them is the Fed­eral Reserve, who is sup­posed to be a watchdog on shaky banking practices.

Invest­ment bankers have many tricks that help to make secu­ri­tized invest­ments more attrac­tive. Appraisers are employed to give favor­able val­u­a­tions (and often greatly inflated) to the under­lying prop­er­ties. Credit agen­cies are employed to give favor­able rat­ings (again, often greatly over-rated) to the invest­ments, thus pro­moting con­fi­dence. The credit risk is often mit­i­gated by adding insur­ance poli­cies, dif­ferent classes of investors, hedging against failure by pur­chasing or selling deriv­a­tives. It gets more com­pli­cated than we want to dis­cuss here.

Cur­rently, Attor­neys Gen­eral in New York, Ohio, and Col­orado are inves­ti­gating illegal appraiser activity with respect to banks and other lenders pres­suring appraisers to fudge their appraisals. The Secu­ri­ties and Exchange Com­mis­sion is cur­rently inves­ti­gating illegal activity at credit rating com­pa­nies who might have been pres­sured into issuing arti­fi­cially high credit ratings.

For the invest­ment bankers, most of their profit is taken out of the “enhance­ment” value at the expense of the under­lying invest­ment that is being pur­chased by unsus­pecting investors. In other words, the ulti­mate investor is get­ting  hosed from the start but the house of cards doesn’t fall until the cash flow starts to dry up — as in, John Doe can’t make his house pay­ment and goes into default on his mortgage.

Secu­ri­ti­za­tions made against the sub-prime lending mar­kets were simply the weakest links in the finan­cial chain.

This is exactly where greed starts to really show up: when bankers decided to relax bor­rowing stan­dards, they began to allow loans that never, ever should have been made. In other words, bor­rowers had defi­cient or delin­quent credit his­to­ries, little doc­u­men­ta­tion on income and over-appraised prop­er­ties. Adjustable rate mort­gages (ARM’s) were tai­lored to fit the income of the bor­rower, which was already too small for a normal loan. Thus, when the ARM adjusted upward, up went the pay­ment amount and the bor­rower finds him­self delin­quent and facing bankruptcy.

Those holding the secu­ri­tized invest­ments all of a sudden receive less income and are forced to “revalue” their invest­ment down to the reality of income actu­ally received plus the prospect of addi­tional declines in income in the future. Remember that these assets were over-inflated in the first place, so investors are forced into taking huge hits on their bal­ance sheets.

Since secu­ri­tized assets are quite illiquid, it is very hard to find another buyer. If you are lucky enough to find one, the buyer will be inter­ested in offering you a “pennies-on-the-dollar” type of price.

It is insuf­fi­cient to blame the credit col­lapse on the sub­prime market. Because it was the weakest ele­ment of an overall flawed invest­ment market, It was simply the first seg­ment to blow up. The rest the market (non-subprime) is fol­lowing right behind it.

Now that people are looking for someone to blame for this debacle, the banking com­mu­nity, including even the Fed­eral Reserve, is shifting the blame to the con­sumer for having made poor bor­rowing deci­sions in the first place. After all, nobody forced them to submit an appli­ca­tion for a loan that they couldn’t afford. They should have known better.

Yet, it was the banking com­mu­nity that struc­tured the loan offers that lured unsus­pecting bor­rowers into their lair. For years, TV ads for mort­gages and credit cards dom­i­nated the air­waves. Many con­sumers received dozens of credit card offers by mail each week. Is it right for the bankers to say that they were merely responding to market con­di­tions, to give the foolish con­sumers what they demanded? In fact, the average person looks to his banker as an “expert adviser”, expecting knowl­edge­able answers that will be in the bor­rowers best interest.

I think not. Their mar­kets were arti­fi­cially cre­ated by the very adver­tising they flooded us with. Adver­tising cre­ates expec­ta­tions that can only be filled by pur­chasing the advertiser’s products.

According to a recent state­ment by Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Henry Paulson, former chairman and CEO of Goldman, Sachs, the Trea­sury will now step in with a plan that “helps investors and lenders avoid unnec­es­sary and costly fore­clo­sures that are not in their interest.” He has also talked of a rate freeze on Adjustable Rate Mort­gages that are soon to reset to a higher interest rate.

You can imagine how the owners of secu­ri­tized invest­ments feel about that. Having been guar­an­teed a cer­tain rate of interest, they will meet any gov­ern­ment inter­ven­tion or price-fixing with a flood of lawsuits.

Of course, a tsunami of law­suits, mort­gage fore­clo­sures and bank­rupt­cies would be fatal to at least a few U.S. banks. Yet appar­ently, to assume respon­si­bility for their own mis­takes (or even crim­inal actions) is too much to ask of them.

If the banking crowd suc­ceeds in taking another full drink from the public trea­sury, it will cost the Amer­ican tax­payers bil­lions in the end.

Mean­while, don’t expect that  the banking crisis is lim­ited to just the sub­prime lending market: It’s merely the tip of the iceberg!

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Globalization of California Forum

Globalization of California

Premium Subscriber Access

Email:
Password:
Remember   

Forgot Password

News & Analysis

  • Transhumanism, Technocracy, Total Surveillance Society

    Tran­shu­manism, Tech­noc­racy and Total Sur­veil­lance Society are show­cased in this 3 hour radio pre­sen­ta­tion with Patrick Wood, Carl Teichrib and Kaye Beach. It is a good primer and helpful to bring the lis­tener to a solid basic under­standing of what it … Con­tinue reading

  • Is Trayvon Sparking a Communist Revolution?

    Are you puz­zled by the over-reaction and civil unrest over the George Zim­merman trial? Con­sider this: Com­mu­nist front groups are throwing every­thing they have at fomenting and con­tin­uing the protests for their own agenda. Many of these groups have no … Con­tinue reading

  • Risk of Global Financial Freeze-up Rising

    If you thought it couldn’t happen again, get ready: A new global finan­cial freeze-up could be straight ahead. It’s too bad that eco­nomics, trade, finance, etc., are such boring topics to most people. Well, they actu­ally are boring because they … Con­tinue reading

People want to know…

faq

What is Globalization?

It is the col­lective effect of pur­poseful and amoral manip­u­la­tion that seeks to cen­tralize eco­nomic, polit­ical, tech­no­log­ical and soci­etal forces in order to accrue max­imum profit and polit­ical power to global banks, global cor­po­ra­tions and the elit­ists who run them. It is rapidly moving toward an full and final imple­men­ta­tion of Technocracy.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

What is the Tri­lat­eral Commission?

Founded in 1973 by David Rock­e­feller and Zbig­niew Brzezinski, the Com­mis­sion set out to create a “New Inter­na­tional Eco­nomic Order”, namely, Tech­noc­racy. The orig­inal mem­ber­ship con­sisted of elit­ists (bankers, politi­cians, aca­d­e­mics, indus­tri­al­ists) from Japan, North America and Europe. Col­lec­tively, they have dom­i­nated and con­trolled trade and eco­nomic policy in their respec­tive coun­tries since at least 1974.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

What is Technocracy?

Tech­noc­racy is a move­ment started in the 1930’s by engi­neers, sci­en­tists and tech­ni­cians that pro­posed the replace­ment of cap­i­talism with an energy-based economy. Orig­i­nally envi­sioned for North America only, it is now being applied on a global basis. Authors Aldous Huxley and George Orwell believed that Tech­noc­racy would result in a Sci­en­tific Dic­ta­tor­ship, as reflected in their books, “Brave New World” and “1984″.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

What is Smart Grid?

Smart Grid is the national and global imple­men­ta­tion of dig­ital and Wi-fi enabled power meters that enable com­mu­ni­ca­tion between the appli­ances in your home or busi­ness, with the power provider. This pro­vides con­trol over your appli­ances and your usage of elec­tricity, gas and water.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Who is M. King Hubbert?

Hub­bert was a geo-physicist who co-founded Tech­noc­racy, Inc. in 1932 and authored its Tech­noc­racy Study Course. In 1954, he became the cre­ator of the “Peak Oil Theory”, or “Hubbert’s Peak” which the­o­rized that the world was rapidly run­ning out of carbon-based fuels. Hub­bert is widely con­sid­ered as a “founding father” of the global warming and green movements.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Who is R. Buck­min­ster Fuller?

A pio­neer in global eco­log­ical theory, Fuller (1895 – 1984) was the first to sug­gest the devel­op­ment of a Global Energy Grid that is today known as the Global Smart Grid. Fuller is widely con­sid­ered to be a “founding father” of the global green move­ment, including global warming, Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment, Agenda 21, etc.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Is the Venus Project like Technocracy?

The Venus Project, founded by Jacque Fresco, is a utopian, modern-day iter­a­tion of Tech­noc­racy. Like Tech­noc­racy, it scraps cap­i­talism and pro­poses that “a resource-based economy all of the world’s resources are held as the common her­itage of all of Earth’s people, thus even­tu­ally out­growing the need for the arti­fi­cial bound­aries that sep­a­rate people.” The appli­ca­tion of tech­nology is the answer to all of the world’s prob­lems, including war, famine and poverty.

VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)