By Patrick Wood, Editor

Sep­tember 18, 2009

When Obama abruptly dropped the Eastern Euro­pean mis­sile shield, the real motive became quickly vis­ible. Buried in a Reuter’s article was the fol­lowing side note:

“Shortly after the pull­back on the shield pro­gramme was announced, Russia’s gov­ern­ment said Prime Min­ister Vladimir Putin would meet sev­eral U.S. exec­u­tives on Friday from firms including Gen­eral Elec­tric, Morgan Stanley as well as TPG, one of the world’s largest pri­vate equity firms.“

In fact, all three com­pa­nies men­tioned have con­nec­tions to the Tri­lat­eral Commission:

• Dinakar Singh, Founder and Chief Exec­u­tive Officer, TPG-Axon Cap­ital, New York, NY; former Co-head, Prin­cipal Strate­gies Depart­ment, Goldman Sachs
• Robert W. Lane, Board of Direc­tors Gen­eral Elec­tric; Chairman and Chief Exec­u­tive Officer, Deere & Com­pany, Moline, IL
• Lord Simon of High­bury, Senior Adviser of Morgan Stanley Europe; Member of the House of Lords, Deputy Chairman of
  Unilever; Non-Executive Director of Suez Group; former Min­ister for Trade & Com­pet­i­tive­ness in
  Europe;  former Chairman of BP, London

Gen­eral Electric’s influ­ence in the White House is second only to Goldman Sachs.

As noted in Obama: Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion Endgame, mem­bers of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion have thor­oughly sat­u­rated the Obama admin­is­tra­tion — 13 per­cent of the U.S. mem­ber­ship now hold crit­ical posi­tions, including,

• Sec­re­tary of Trea­sury, Tim Gei­thner
• Ambas­sador to the United Nations, Susan Rice
• National Secu­rity Advisor, Gen. James L. Jones
• Deputy National Secu­rity Advisor, Thomas Donilon
• Chairman, Eco­nomic Recovery Com­mittee, Paul Volker
• Director of National Intel­li­gence, Admiral Dennis C. Blair
• Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of State, Asia & Pacific,  Kurt M. Campbell
• Deputy Sec­re­tary of State, James Stein­berg
• State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Richard Haass
• State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Dennis Ross
• State Depart­ment, Spe­cial Envoy, Richard Hol­brooke
• Deputy Under­sec­re­tary of State for eco­nomic, energy and agri­cul­tural affairs, Robert Hor­mats

Note that Robert Hor­mats was vice-chairman of Goldman Sachs prior to his recent appoint­ment. The eco­nomic devel­op­ment of Russia is part of his spe­cific responsibilities.

The pur­pose of con­trol­ling the Exec­u­tive Branch since the elec­tion of Jimmy Carter in 1976, has been to create insider busi­ness deals for them­selves, at the expense of everyone else. The fact that Eastern Europe will now be at the mercy of Vladimir Putin and the Russian Bear doesn’t seem to bother the Tri­lat­erals in the slightest.

Until this hege­mony is exposed and broken up, there is zero per­cent chance of turning back Obama’s Marxist destruc­tion of America as we know it today.

For fur­ther infor­ma­tion, see the fol­lowing articles…

ANALYSIS-US firms, others may gain from shield pullback

Obama helps strengthen Gen­eral Electric-Putin ties

List of Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion Members

By Patrick Wood, Editor
August 5, 2008

Will it matter if Obama or McCain are elected in November? Hardly.

Both are rigidly backed by impor­tant mem­bers of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion who hijacked the Exec­u­tive Branch of the U.S. gov­ern­ment starting in 1976 with the elec­tion of Jimmy Carter.

In Obama’s case, Zbig­niew Brzezinski (co-founder of the Com­mis­sion in 1973) is emerging as his prin­cipal advisor on for­eign policy. Ex-Fed Chairman Paul Volker has made a once-in-a-lifetime, glowing endorse­ment of Obama. Madelyn Albright is seen sit­ting next to Obama in sev­eral con­fer­ences. Shoot, even Jimmy Carter him­self endorses Obama. All are top mem­bers of the Commission.

John McCain is being sup­ported by sev­eral Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion giants including: Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, Lawrence Eagle­burger and Alexander Haig. All of these are ex-Secretaries of State who issued a joint endorse­ment of McCain early-on in his campaign.

And, unless Obama shoots both of his own feet (or…?) before the gen­eral pres­i­den­tial elec­tion in November, he is most likely to be the next pres­i­dent of the United States.

You would think that Amer­i­cans would want to know who the “spe­cial inter­ests” are that are embodied by this Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion, and what they intend to do or not do with America.

What is the Tri­lat­eral Commission?

The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion was founded by the per­sis­tent maneu­vering of David Rock­e­feller and Zbig­niew Brzezinski in 1973. Rock­e­feller was chairman of the ultra-powerful Chase Man­hattan Bank, a director of many major multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions and “endow­ment funds” and had long been a cen­tral figure in the Council on For­eign Rela­tions (CFR). Brzezinski, a bril­liant prog­nos­ti­cator of one-world ide­alism, was a pro­fessor at Columbia Uni­ver­sity and the author of sev­eral books that have served as “policy guide­lines” for the Tri­lat­eral Commission.

Brzezinski served as the Commission’s first exec­u­tive director from its incep­tion in 1973 until late 1976 when he was appointed by Pres­i­dent Jimmy Carter as Assis­tant to the Pres­i­dent for National Secu­rity Affairs.

The ini­tial Com­mis­sion mem­ber­ship was approx­i­mately three hun­dred, with roughly one hun­dred each from Europe, Japan and North America. Mem­ber­ship was also roughly divided between aca­d­e­mics, politi­cians and cor­po­rate mag­nates; these included inter­na­tional bankers, leaders of promi­nent labor unions and cor­po­rate direc­tors of media giants.

The word com­mis­sion was puz­zling since it is usu­ally asso­ci­ated with instru­men­tal­i­ties set up by gov­ern­ments. It seemed out of place with a so-called pri­vate group unless we could deter­mine that it really was an arm of a gov­ern­ment – an unseen gov­ern­ment, dif­ferent from the vis­ible gov­ern­ment in Wash­ington. Euro­pean and Japanese involve­ment indi­cated a world gov­ern­ment rather than a national gov­ern­ment. We hoped that the con­cept of a sub-rosa world gov­ern­ment was just wishful thinking on the part of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sioners. The facts, how­ever, lined up quite pessimistically.

If the Council on For­eign Rela­tions could be said to be a spawning ground for the con­cepts of one-world ide­alism, then the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion was the “task force” assem­bled to assault the beach­heads. Already the Com­mis­sion had placed its mem­bers in the top posts the U.S. had to offer.

Jimmy Carter: The first Tri­lat­eral president

Pres­i­dent James Earl Carter, the country politi­cian who promised, “I will never lie to you,” was chosen to join the Commission by Brzezinski in 1973. It was Brzezinski, in fact, who first iden­ti­fied Carter as pres­i­den­tial timber, and sub­se­quently edu­cated him in eco­nomics, for­eign policy, and the ins-and-outs of world pol­i­tics. Upon Carter’s elec­tion, Brzezinski was appointed assis­tant to the pres­i­dent for national secu­rity mat­ters. Com­monly, he was called the head of the National Secu­rity Council because he answered only to the pres­i­dent – some said Brzezinski held the second most pow­erful posi­tion in the U.S.

Carter’s run­ning mate, Walter Mon­dale, was also a member of the Com­mis­sion. (If you are trying to cal­cu­late the odds of three vir­tu­ally unknown men, out of over sixty Com­mis­sioners from the U.S., cap­turing the three most pow­erful posi­tions in the land, don’t bother. Your cal­cu­la­tions will be meaningless.)

On Jan­uary 7, 1977 Time Mag­a­zine, whose editor-in-chief, Hedley Donovan was a pow­erful Tri­lat­eral, named Pres­i­dent Carter “Man of the Year.” The sixteen-page article in that issue not only failed to men­tion Carter’s con­nec­tion with the Com­mis­sion but also stated the following:

“As he searched for Cab­inet appointees, Carter seemed at times hes­i­tant and frus­trated dis­con­cert­ingly out of char­acter. His lack of ties to Wash­ington and the Party Estab­lish­ment – qual­i­ties that helped raise him to the White House – carry poten­tial dan­gers. He does not know the Fed­eral Gov­ern­ment or the pres­sures it cre­ates. He does not really know the politi­cians whom he will need to help him run the country.”

Was this por­trait of Carter as a polit­ical inno­cent simply inac­cu­rate or was it delib­er­ately mis­leading? By December 25, 1976 – two weeks before the Time article appeared – Carter had already chosen his cab­inet. Three of his cab­inet mem­bers – Cyrus Vance, Michael Blu­men­thal, and Harold Brown – were Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sioners; and the other non-Commission mem­bers were not unsym­pa­thetic to Com­mis­sion objec­tives and oper­a­tions. In addi­tion, Carter had appointed another four­teen Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sioners to top gov­ern­ment posts, including:

• C. Fred Berg­sten (Under Sec­re­tary of Treasury)
• James Schlesinger (Sec­re­tary of Energy)
• Elliot Richardson (Del­e­gate to Law of the Sea)
• Leonard Wood­cock (Chief envoy to China)
• Andrew Young (Ambas­sador to the United Nations).

As of 25 December 1976, there­fore, there were nine­teen Tri­lat­erals, including Carter and Mon­dale, holding tremen­dous polit­ical power. These pres­i­den­tial appointees rep­re­sented almost one-third of the Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion mem­bers from the United States. The odds of that hap­pening “by chance” are beyond calculation!

Real­i­ties of the New World Order

In 1972, Brzezinski’s wrote that “nation-state as a fun­da­mental unit of man’s orga­nized life has ceased to be the prin­cipal cre­ative force: Inter­na­tional banks and multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions are acting and plan­ning in terms that are far in advance of the polit­ical con­cepts of the nation-state.”
The late Sen­ator Barry Gold­water (R-AZ) was one of a very few people who under­stood what Brzezinski was alluding to, when he issued a clear and pre­cise warning in his 1979 book, With No Apologies:

“The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion is inter­na­tional and is intended to be the vehicle for multi­na­tional con­sol­i­da­tion of the com­mer­cial and banking inter­ests by seizing con­trol of the polit­ical gov­ern­ment of the United States. The Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion rep­re­sents a skillful, coor­di­nated effort to seize con­trol and con­sol­i­date the four cen­ters of power – polit­ical, mon­e­tary, intel­lec­tual and ecclesiastical.”

Tri­lat­eral Entrench­ment: 1980 – 2008

Every Admin­is­tra­tion since Carter has had top-level Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion rep­re­sen­ta­tion through the Pres­i­dent or Vice-President, or both! George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and Dick Cheney are all members.

In turn, these have appointed their Tri­lat­eral cronies to top posi­tions in their Administrations.

For instance, six out of seven World Bank pres­i­dents have been mem­bers of the Com­mis­sion. Eight out of ten USTR’s (U.S. Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive) have been members.

Sec­re­taries of State include Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, Alexander Haig, George Schultz, Lawrence Eagle­burger, Warren Christo­pher and Madeleine Albright. Yep, all mem­bers of the Tri­lat­eral Commission.

Follow the money, follow the power

You decide which is scarier: Obama and Brzezinski or McCain and Henry Kissinger?

Either way, Amer­i­cans will con­tinue to lose…

Every major crisis we face today is directly attrib­ut­able to poli­cies put forth and exe­cuted by mem­bers of this Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion: Banking/lending/mortgage crisis, energy/gas price crisis, food/shortage/price crisis.

In addi­tion, in the last fif­teen to twenty years we have lost of mil­lions of prime man­u­fac­turing jobs to China, India and Mexico. Our prime assets are being pur­chased by sov­er­eign wealth funds and for­eign investors. Our cur­rency has all but been destroyed throughout the world.

Remember Brzezinski’s vision that “inter­na­tional banks and multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions are acting and plan­ning in terms that are far in advance of the polit­ical con­cepts of the nation-state”?

Well, that’s been true enough. But, for all their acting and plan­ning at the expense of our own pros­perity and sov­er­eignty, who wants or needs more of the same under Obama or McCain? With friends like this, who needs enemies?

For sev­eral Pres­i­den­tial elec­tions now, this writer has voted according to the phi­los­ophy of voting for the “lesser of two evils.” Never again!

A vote for either Obama or McCain is a vote for the com­plete destruc­tion of America!